Modern teenagers seem to be universally concerned with artifice - the greatest insult one can receive at this stage in life is to be called a “phony,” a “poseur.” As an adolescent, I was greatly concerned by the prospect that I was trying to artificially recreate art in my daily life, that my entire existence was insincere, “affected.”
It was not even that I was was trying to live someone else’s art; I only wanted to live my own.
But art follows life, always, not the other way around. It is both impossible to live art and impossible not to. So what was it I was so worried about? What is it so many young people are so worried about?
I think the confusion must come about when one gets too stuck on terms, on definitions. For years, I had my pet concepts (namely beauty, stillness, smallness), and the task of coming to understanding them obsessed me. My greatest desire was to be able to answer the question “What is beauty?” - a question philosophers have been working on for ages, perhaps for always.
My goal in understanding these ideals was to practice them, to embody them, to distill them to their purest forms and drink the elixir that would color my world anew and turn me transcendent. (This selfishness must drive even the most noble quests for knowledge - do it for yourself first, let the salvation of the rest of the world follow, if it will.)
In any case, what escaped me was that these terms were created to explain life. Beauty was there before “beauty” was a concept. There was nothing I needed to do to create beauty in my life or through my life. Everything was already as it should be.
Maybe the artifice here is in trying to explain something that one has no need to explain. Maybe the artifice is in making a concerted effort to live a certain condensed way when, in fact, the condensed way was only “designed” to portray the way one lives quite naturally.
At the same time, this struggle itself is quite natural. It is also as it should be.
It must be impossible to live a “phony” life, even at fifteen.
* * *
Love affairs operate in dimensions all their own, in bubbles built for two (or one, as we all have our love affairs with ourselves). Though a couple in love still, to some extent, interacts with the rest of the world as per usual, within the landscape of the affair, perception is altered entirely. Love creates a new language, a new mythology, a new symbolism. From the outside, onlookers can see this in the form of pet names and “inside” jokes. From the midst of it, the scope expands indefinitely, creating an entire universe to contain the love, for nothing smaller could suffice.
Couples are sometimes criticized for trying to live out a fairy tale rather than reality. But a fairy tale is only a short and incomplete attempt to capture the level of surrealism and fantasy which envitably plays into every affair. We all have our aesthetics, and relationships become our canvases when all other media has failed us.
Love inspires the imagination like nothing else. The love story is the pinnacle of all art forms, in my opinion. The sad or doomed love story is even better, because that is essentially what life is.
Symbolism we think of as a tool of art, but in an affair especially, we can see clearly how it is there in life as well. If symbols did not exist in the world, they would not be effective in literature or art or anywhere else.
In a love affair, assigning complicated, sentimental, and often bizarre meanings to animals, jewels, tokens, places, and words is quite normal. Art (including fairy tales) only follows this vain. A lover should not seek out a fairy tale, because in the simple act of being in love, she already has one.